Thursday, June 30, 2005

It's not just for UUs any more.

Polyamory, that is.

No, I wasn't surfing the wrong part of the interdependent web. I was merely looking for liberal theology pages, clicked on a link to "liberated Christians", and this is what came up. Honest.

Did I mention that my muse seems to have been taking some time off lately? Did I need to?


At July 1, 2005 at 6:03:00 AM EDT, Blogger Chalicechick said...


If they are calling it "Responsible nonmanogamy," then I don't really have a problem with what they are doing.

It's not the hill I want my church to die on, but hey, takes all kinds to make a world. As long as it's about love, I'm a happy girl.


At July 2, 2005 at 10:40:00 AM EDT, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You been taking that LDS again, fausto? :-)

At July 2, 2005 at 9:44:00 PM EDT, Blogger fausto said...

Nah, even the LDS gave that up a long time ago.

At July 3, 2005 at 4:01:00 PM EDT, Anonymous Art said...

I guess I am old fashioned. In the old days, a hisband and wife sould have an "understanding" regarding other people, but they didn't feel the need to make webpages about it, or to seek theological justification for it. (Pual Tillich, apparently, had an open relationship with his wife.)
Do we have to throw *everything* about ourselves in other people's faces.


Post a Comment

<< Home